The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Status
Posted: Saturday, March 19, 2011
by Patricia Johnson
Articles and Answers.com
"Events are classified at seven levels: Levels 1–3 are "incidents" and Levels 4–7 "accidents". These levels consider three areas of impact: people and the environment, radiological barriers and control, and defence in depth. The scale is designed so that the severity of an event is about ten times greater for each increase in level on the scale. Events without safety significance are called "deviations" and are classified Below Scale/Level 0." http://www-ns.iaea.org/tech-areas/emergency/ines.asp
Diesel generators, used for backup, were started up and began providing electricity to the pumps which in turn started circulating coolant to all six reactors until the tsunami knocked out power to the backup generators.
The status of these units as of March 19, 2011 follows:
Unit 1Data Source: INES and IAEA
Approximately half of the fuel rods in the reactor are covered with coolant, leading to fuel damage. Operators were forced to vent gas from the reactor's containment, due to high pressure. An explosion on March 12, 2011 destroyed the outer shell of the building above. On March 18, Japan assigned an INES rating of 5 to this unit.
Unit 2
Approximately half of the fuel rods in the reactor are covered with coolant, leading to fuel damage. A March 15 explosion led Japanese officials to express concern the reactor's containment may not be fully intact. As recently as March 18, 2011 it was reported that white smoke continues to arise from the building. Seawater is continuing to be pumped into the reactor core. On March 18, Japan assigned an INES rating of 5 to this unit.
Unit 3
Approximately half of the fuel rods in the reactor are covered with coolant, leading to fuel damage. Operators were forced to vent gas from the reactor's containment, due to high pressure. An explosion on March 14, 2011 destroyed the outer shell of the building above the containment giving rise to concerns the reactor's containment may not be fully intact. In addition indications are the cooling water level in the pool is not sufficient. Helicopters have been dropping water on this unit and on March 18, seven fire trucks were used by Japanese Self Defence Forces to spray water into the building. No data is available regarding the temperature of the water in the pool. On March 18, Japan assigned an INES rating of 5 to this unit.
Unit 4
Prior to the earthquake fuel had been removed from the reactor core for maintenance and placed in the spent fuel pool. The outer shell of the building was damaged by an explosion at Unit 3 on March 14 and two reported fires. Smoke remains visible on March 18 and there are concerns of the condition of the spent fuel pool. . On March 18, Japan assigned an INES rating of 4 to this unit.
Unit 5 and 6
Both units were shut down before the earthquake for maintenance; therefore there are no immediate concerns regarding reactors' cores or containment. Data from spent fuel pools has shown increasing temperatures and officials have two diesel generators running to power water circulation in the spent fuel pools and cores. Since an accumulation of hydrogen has been suspected as the cause of explosions in the other buildings workers have opened holes in the roofs of both buildings.
|
Status |
Unit 1 |
Unit 2 |
Unit 3 |
Unit 4 |
Unit 5 |
Unit 6 |
|
INES Rating |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
** |
** |
|
Reactor Type |
BWR-3 |
BWR-4 |
BWR-4 |
BWR-4 |
BWR-4 |
BWR-5 |
|
Status at Time of Event |
In service Automatic Shutdown After Earthquake |
In service Automatic Shutdown After Earthquake |
In service Automatic Shutdown After Earthquake |
Shut down For Routine Maintenance Before Earthquake |
Shut down For Routine Maintenance Before Earthquake |
Shut down For Routine Maintenance Before Earthquake |
|
Core and Fuel |
Damaged |
Damaged |
Damaged |
No fuel rods |
No damage Expected |
No damage Expected |
|
Containment Integrity |
No damage Reported |
Damage Suspected |
No Information |
Outage Configuration |
No damage Expected |
No damage Expected |
|
Off-site Power |
Recovery Ongoing |
Recovery Ongoing |
Not Available |
Not Available |
Not Available |
Not Available |
|
Diesel Generators |
Not Available |
Not Available |
Not Available |
Not Available |
Generators Powering Units 5 & 6 |
Generators Powering Units 5 & 6 |
|
Building |
Severe Damage |
Slight Damage |
Severe Damage |
Not Available |
No Damage Reported |
No Damage Reported |
|
Water level in Reactor Pressure Vessel |
About Half of Fuel Assembly |
About Half of Fuel Assembly |
About Half of Fuel Assembly |
About Half of Fuel Assembly |
Outage Configuration |
Above fuel |
|
Pressure of Reactor Pressure Vessel |
Stable |
Unreliable Data |
Stabilized |
Outage Configuration |
No Information |
No Information |
|
Water Injection to Reactor Pressure Vessel |
Sea Water |
Sea Water |
Sea Water |
Outage Configuration |
Not Necessary |
Not Necessary |
© 2011 Patricia L Johnson
This Article has been viewed 284 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)Hi Patricia.
Thanks for putting it all in a nutshell. I certainly hope they get it all squared away soon. They've enough to worry about without worrying about a nuclear disaster as well.
Hugs,
DianneIt's almost impossible to comprehend what this country is going through - most countries have a problem dealing with one catastrophe and yet the people of Japan are attempting to cope with three at one time. Things are steadily improving on the interior of the power plant, but according to the latest IAEA report (3-22-11), "high levels of contamination have been measured in the locality of the plant" which certainly isn't good news. Let us all pray that things improve soon.
Thank you for your comment.
P.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.
