Are Tax Cuts the Driving Force Behind Job Creation and Economic Growth?
Posted: Monday, October 10, 2011
by Patricia Johnson
Articles and Answers.com
Republican Presidential candidates would have us believe increasing taxes stifles job creation and economic growth in this country, but what does an analysis of economic indicators before and after tax cuts indicate?
Proponents of supply-side economics believe economic growth is achieved by reducing taxes. They believe tax reductions provide workers with an incentive to work harder, encourage businesses to hire more workers and invest more. They further believe lowering capital gains tax rates and reducing regulations benefits consumers by providing lower prices.
Comparing data before and after tax cuts from one year to another during any administration is difficult when everything is not equal during the entire administration, therefore the Congressional Research Service removed the recession years from their analysis as well as the years when the tax cuts were not fully implemented.
The end result of this analysis follows:
Data Source: Congressional Research Service - CRS calculations based on data from BEA and BLS.
The economy performed better in seven of the nine categories before the tax cuts, than after the tax cuts.
While the annual average unemployment is indicated as 5.2% for both Clinton and Bush, unemployment dropped from 6.9% in 1993 to 4.0% under the higher tax rates of the Clinton administration. If 2008 had been included in the Bush calculations, the variance between the two annual figures would have been significant due to the number of jobs lost in 2008 [3.6 million].
From a job creation standpoint alone, it’s well documented that 20 million more jobs were created during the administration of William J. Clinton than during the administration of George W. Bush.
The number that is most noteworthy is Business Investment Growth at an annual rate of 10.3 percent under high taxes v. 5.6 percent with lowered tax rates. The 10.3 percent under Clinton is almost double the investment growth under Bush.
It is obvious, from the CRS comparison, that tax cuts do not grow the economy. In the case of the Bush tax cuts, it would be fair to say they have almost destroyed the economy.
Under certain conditions short-term tax cuts are necessary to stimulate the economy, even when they are deficit-financed, which is what President Obama is currently requesting from Congress.
© Patricia L Johnson
This Article has been viewed 386 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)I would argue higher taxes cause job creation and economic growth. Those who say otherwise probably have never operated a business.
Years ago I had a year where I made $10,000 more than the previous year, and paid $5,000 more in taxes. Not wanting to do this again, I hired another employee and bought some new equipment so I would pay less taxes. So more taxes = job creation and economic investment, plain and simple.
When taxes are low, business have more incentive to sit on their money. Any first-year business student knows this, it's so obvious. Unfortunately most of the Republican party doesn't understand this.A decade ago we were all brainwashed into believing Iraq had WMD's - my guess is the economy is simply another Republican exercise in brainwashing - if we hear it often enough we tend to believe what we're told, even when the facts tell a different story.
Thank you for your comment Bruce.
Pat Johnson
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.